Model lowers LaGuardia departure delay risk 9 PM–midnight Friday to 54%
- Current state
- Developing
- Started
- Latest activity
- Updates
- 2
Tailodds reports what the FAA publishes, what we measure and what our model forecasts. It doesn’t control airport operations or change bookings; check with your airline about your trip.
Updates oldest first
-
Initial Forecast
Model forecasts 59% delay risk for LaGuardia departures 9 PM–midnight Friday
Tailodds’ model gives the 18 departures scheduled from LaGuardia 9 PM–midnight Friday an average 59% chance of leaving 15+ minutes late. With calm weather the same flights would average 22%. From the 8:00 PM EST forecast (model famA-fc-v3). This is a forecast, not a report of delays.
Evidence for this update
Target LGA departures 9 PM–midnight 2026-11-13 (15+ min late) Probability (calibrated, mean per flight) 59% over 18 flights Forecast cycle · horizon Thu Nov 12, 8:00 PM EST · 23.5 h ahead Model version famA-fc-v3 Source event time Ingested Published here (2026-11-13 02:27 UTC) Sources Tailodds forecast Provenance forecast_blocks forecast-blocks-v1 · config 2026-10-17.1 · writer template-v1 Was this useful? -
De-escalation Forecast
Model lowers LaGuardia departure delay risk 9 PM–midnight Friday to 54%
What changed: 59% → 54% since the 8:00 PM EST forecast (same model, same window)
Tailodds’ model gives the 30 departures scheduled from LaGuardia 9 PM–midnight Friday an average 54% chance of leaving 15+ minutes late. With calm weather the same flights would average 20%. From the 11:00 PM EST forecast (model famA-fc-v3). This is a forecast, not a report of delays.
Evidence for this update
Target LGA departures 9 PM–midnight 2026-11-13 (15+ min late) Probability (calibrated, mean per flight) 54% over 30 flights Forecast cycle · horizon Thu Nov 12, 11:00 PM EST · 21.0 h ahead Model version famA-fc-v3 Source event time Ingested Published here (2026-11-13 04:58 UTC) Sources Tailodds forecast Provenance forecast_blocks forecast-blocks-v1 · config 2026-10-17.1 · writer template-v1 Was this useful?